From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264428AbUEJAlc (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 20:41:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264429AbUEJAlc (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 20:41:32 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([209.173.204.2]:45293 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264428AbUEJAla (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2004 20:41:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 19:41:22 -0500 From: Matt Mackall To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Andrew Morton , Paul Mackerras , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Un-inline spinlocks on ppc64 Message-ID: <20040510004121.GM5414@waste.org> References: <16542.51381.215308.485006@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20040509172038.55319fbd.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:31:44PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > yOn Sun, 9 May 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > > > > The patch below moves the ppc64 spinlocks and rwlocks out of line and > > > into arch/ppc64/lib/locks.c, and implements _raw_spin_lock_flags for > > > ppc64. > > > > > > > It included a hunk against include/asm-ppc64/offsets.h, which I dropped. > > Regarding CONFIG_INLINE_SPINLOCKS, could we call it CONFIG_SPINLINE as is > the current option supported on i386? Ugh, I've never liked that config name. Let's change it to be the less clever version, please. -- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting