From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262080AbUEKFWN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 01:22:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262138AbUEKFWN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 01:22:13 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:11483 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262080AbUEKFWL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 01:22:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 22:21:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-mm1 Message-Id: <20040510222143.6ab44a87.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040510162012.B3856@infradead.org> References: <20040510024506.1a9023b6.akpm@osdl.org> <20040510162012.B3856@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Btw, one more thing as you're probably sending the i_shared_sem re- > spinlockification to Linus just about now: as we're renaming the thing > anyway can we give it a less confusing name like i_mmap_lock? It's not > been about shared mapping only for ages. sure...