From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263365AbUEKS4S (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 14:56:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263340AbUEKS4R (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 14:56:17 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:22722 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263380AbUEKS4E (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 14:56:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:55:39 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Neil Schemenauer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-mm1 Message-Id: <20040511115539.3c840ebc.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040511144918.GA4764@mems-exchange.org> References: <20040511144918.GA4764@mems-exchange.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Neil Schemenauer wrote: > > Have you seen my capwrap[1] module? I wouldn't call it elegant but > it is very simple and flexible. It is. But if the application which you run does execve(), the capabilties are dropped. And if it does setuid() without first doing prctl(PR_SET_KEEPCAPS, 1); then setuid() also drops capabilities.