From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263632AbUELMmn (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2004 08:42:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265040AbUELMmn (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2004 08:42:43 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:45219 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263632AbUELMmm (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2004 08:42:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:38:59 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: John McCutchan Cc: Chris Wedgwood , nautilus-list@gnome.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement Message-ID: <20040512123859.GA13066@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <1084152941.22837.21.camel@vertex> <20040510021141.GA10760@taniwha.stupidest.org> <1084227460.28663.8.camel@vertex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1084227460.28663.8.camel@vertex> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 May 2004 18:17:40 -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > > I now use ino_t and dev_t , though in struct inode, i_no is unsigned > long? Correct. That definition should be changed as well, I just didn't care enough to submit a patch yet. Anyway, old mistakes never justify new mistakes. Jörn -- People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin Franklin said it first. -- unknown