From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264067AbUEMKwS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 06:52:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264082AbUEMKwS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 06:52:18 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:33205 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264073AbUEMKwR (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 06:52:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 03:51:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-mm2 Message-Id: <20040513035134.2e9013ea.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040513114520.A8442@infradead.org> References: <20040513032736.40651f8e.akpm@osdl.org> <20040513114520.A8442@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > +hugetlb_shm_group-sysctl-gid-0-fix.patch > > > > Don't make gid 0 special for hugetlb shm. > > As Oracle has agreed on fixing their DB to use hugetlbfs could we > please stop doctoring around on this broken patch and revert it. Once I'm convinced that kernel.org kernels will be able to run applications which vendor kernels will run, sure. We're nowhere near that, and your continual whining gets us no closer.