From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263784AbUEMFsW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 01:48:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263788AbUEMFsW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 01:48:22 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:50446 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263784AbUEMFsV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 01:48:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 06:48:13 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Andrew Morton , davidm@hpl.hp.com, rddunlap@osdl.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, drepper@redhat.com, fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Re: [announce] kexec for linux 2.6.6 Message-ID: <20040513064813.A5777@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Willy Tarreau , Andrew Morton , davidm@hpl.hp.com, rddunlap@osdl.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, drepper@redhat.com, fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <40A2517C.4040903@redhat.com> <20040512143233.0ee0405a.rddunlap@osdl.org> <16546.41076.572371.307153@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20040512152815.76280eac.akpm@osdl.org> <16546.42537.765495.231960@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20040512161603.44c50cec.akpm@osdl.org> <20040513053051.A5286@infradead.org> <20040513050515.GA578@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040513050515.GA578@alpha.home.local>; from willy@w.ods.org on Thu, May 13, 2004 at 07:05:15AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 07:05:15AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > And why not definitely assign sort of a "multiplexed syscall" entry, > a la sys_socketcall() ? Because that's the worst possible API you could imagine.