From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264392AbUEMSr1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 14:47:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264404AbUEMSr1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 14:47:27 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:19344 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264392AbUEMSrZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 14:47:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 04:43:18 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Who owns those locks ? Message-ID: <20040513184318.GG11588@krispykreme> References: <40A1F4BE.4A298352@nospam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40A1F4BE.4A298352@nospam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Why don't you put the ID of the owner of the lock in the lock word ? > Here is your patch for IA-64. > Doesn't cost any additional instruction, you can have it in your > "production" kernel, too. We already do this on ppc64. Anton