From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265237AbUENKwt (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 06:52:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265192AbUENKwt (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 06:52:49 -0400 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:31986 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265248AbUENKws (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 06:52:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 03:50:39 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: raghav@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, maneesh@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, torvalds@osdl.org, manfred@colorfullife.com, davej@redhat.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dentry bloat. Message-Id: <20040514035039.347871e8.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040514103322.GA6474@in.ibm.com> References: <409B1511.6010500@colorfullife.com> <20040508012357.3559fb6e.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508022304.17779635.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508031159.782d6a46.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508120148.1be96d66.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508201259.GA6383@in.ibm.com> <20041006125824.GE2004@in.ibm.com> <20040511132205.4b55292a.akpm@osdl.org> <20040514103322.GA6474@in.ibm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Looks like the new hashing function has brought down the performance. "brought down the performance" as in "better, faster", right? That is, your numbers show that the new hashing function is good, right? Or do I have it backwards? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373