mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Kronos <kronos@kronoz.cjb.net>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [4KSTACK][2.6.6] Stack overflow in radeonfb
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:00:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040514100017.GA23863@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084488980.1935.119.camel@gaston>

On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:56:21 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > I'm not sure what the point behind the radeon_write_mode() is at all.
> > The best solution could be to just merge radeon_write_mode() and
> > radeonfb_set_par() into a single function and do the tons of OUTREG()
> > directly.  In that case, don't bother to fix any typos
> 
> No, they should stay separate functions. I may use write_mode in a
> different way in the future (like restoring previous mode on module
> unload for example) and I'm very much against merging 2 already too big
> function into one huge horror.

Not sure if the combined function would really be bigger than either
one alone.  Basically, set_par writes to a temp struct and write_mode
writes from the temp struct to hardware.  Sounds like quite a bit of
redundant code could be removed.

With more users for write_mode the seperate function makes sense
again, so you should keep it.  Just the second argument isn't valid
imo.

Jörn

-- 
Correctness comes second.
Features come third.
Performance comes last.
Maintainability is needed for all of them.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-14 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-13 13:48 Kronos
2004-05-13 14:03 ` Kronos
2004-05-13 14:56 ` Kronos
2004-05-13 15:15   ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-13 15:36     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-13 16:02       ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-13 22:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-14 10:00       ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2004-05-13 22:55   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-14  1:21     ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14  3:26       ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-14  9:49       ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-14 11:47         ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-14 22:15           ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14 22:56             ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14 23:18               ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14 23:19                 ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14 23:48                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-17 10:53                     ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-15  7:19             ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-17 23:35             ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-17 23:59               ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-26 10:06                 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-26 10:08                   ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-19 10:28               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-19 12:01                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-26 10:17                   ` Jörn Engel
     [not found]               ` <20040518051745.GK2151@krispykreme>
     [not found]                 ` <20040518171136.GC28735@waste.org>
     [not found]                   ` <20040518171959.GQ2151@krispykreme>
     [not found]                     ` <20040518174734.GE28735@waste.org>
2004-05-26 10:14                       ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-14 16:41     ` Kronos
2004-05-14 21:48       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-14 22:34         ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14 22:36           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040514100017.GA23863@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
    --to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=kronos@kronoz.cjb.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®