mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	luto@myrealbox.com, chrisw@osdl.org,
	olaf+list.linux-kernel@olafdietsche.de, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:48:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040514104827.R21045@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084536213.951.615.camel@cube>; from albert@users.sourceforge.net on Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:03:33AM -0400

* Albert Cahalan (albert@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> This would be an excellent time to reconsider how capabilities
> are assigned to bits. You're breaking things anyway; you might
> as well do all the breaking at once. I want local-use bits so
> that the print queue management access isn't by magic UID/GID.
> We haven't escaped UID-as-priv if server apps and setuid apps
> are still making UID-based access control decisions.

This is too volatile in stable series.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-14 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-14 12:03 Albert Cahalan
2004-05-14 14:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14 17:58   ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14 15:21 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-05-14 15:19   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-05-14 18:06     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-05-14 17:32       ` Albert Cahalan
2004-05-14 21:11         ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14 19:32           ` Albert Cahalan
2004-05-14 18:00   ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14 17:48 ` Chris Wright [this message]
     [not found] <fa.dt4cg55.jnqvr5@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.mu5rj3d.24gtbp@ifi.uio.no>
2004-05-14 15:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14 16:01     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-05-14 16:18       ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14 16:37         ` Stephen Smalley
2004-05-14 18:07         ` Chris Wright
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-13 20:08 Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14  1:20 ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14  1:35   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-14  4:51     ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14  5:33     ` Olaf Dietsche
2004-05-14  6:04       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-14  7:09         ` Olaf Dietsche
2004-05-14  2:27   ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14  4:48     ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14  5:58       ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-14 17:45         ` Chris Wright
2004-05-14  6:39     ` Olaf Dietsche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040514104827.R21045@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@myrealbox.com \
    --cc=olaf+list.linux-kernel@olafdietsche.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®