From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261606AbUENP7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 11:59:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261611AbUENP7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 11:59:40 -0400 Received: from 80-169-17-66.mesanetworks.net ([66.17.169.80]:19141 "EHLO mail.bounceswoosh.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261606AbUENP7i (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 11:59:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:00:40 -0600 From: "Eric D. Mudama" To: Justin Piszcz Cc: bert hubert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux Kernel 2.6 SMP+HT + 1 Intel P4 HT CPU Message-ID: <20040514160040.GA17757@bounceswoosh.org> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Piszcz , bert hubert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <5D3C2276FD64424297729EB733ED1F7605FAE205@email1.mitretek.org> <20040514133947.GB21039@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 14 at 11:07, Justin Piszcz wrote: >So essentially, if one does not enable SMP in Linux, they are not taking >advantage of hyper threading!? correct -- Eric D. Mudama edmudama@mail.bounceswoosh.org