From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261724AbUEOKgz (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 06:36:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261851AbUEOKgz (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 06:36:55 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:4027 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261724AbUEOKgw (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 06:36:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 12:36:51 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Linux Kernel Cc: Trond Myklebust , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: RPC request reserved 0 but used 96 Message-ID: <20040515103650.GB24600@suse.de> References: <20040515083831.GR17326@suse.de> <20040515085819.GS17326@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040515085819.GS17326@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 15 2004, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sat, May 15 2004, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Seeing lots of these on a small server that hosts nfs shares (root and > > "normal"). > > > > router:~ # dmesg | tail -n5 > > RPC request reserved 0 but used 96 > > RPC request reserved 0 but used 96 > > RPC request reserved 0 but used 140 > > RPC request reserved 0 but used 140 > > RPC request reserved 0 but used 96 > > > > I see nfs stalls on the client, doesn't seem to be directly related to > > when the above messages happen. > > This went out a little early, lots of pieces missing. > > The server is running 2.6.6-mm2, NFS options are as follows: > > CONFIG_NFS_FS=y > CONFIG_NFS_V3=y > # CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set > CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO=y > CONFIG_NFSD=y > CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y > # CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is not set > CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y > CONFIG_LOCKD=y > CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y > CONFIG_EXPORTFS=y > CONFIG_SUNRPC=y > > The shares are exported async. > > Client is running 2.4.26, mount options are nfsvers=3,tcp. > > I'll be trying 2.6.6-BK on the server now. 2.6.6-BK with shares exported sync show the same behaviour. I get: RPC request reserved 0 but used 32900 RPC request reserved 0 but used 32900 RPC request reserved 0 but used 96 and client stalls with a: nfs: server router not responding, still trying nfs: server router OK at that time. -- Jens Axboe