From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S263173AbUEPG32@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263173AbUEPG32 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 16 May 2004 02:29:28 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263183AbUEPG32
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 16 May 2004 02:29:28 -0400
Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:27044 "EHLO mail.osdl.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263173AbUEPG31 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 16 May 2004 02:29:27 -0400
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 23:28:58 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl
Subject: Re: [patch] kill off PC9800
Message-Id: <20040515232858.022abe77.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040515232155.134a76be.rddunlap@osdl.org>
References: <20040515232155.134a76be.rddunlap@osdl.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>  PC9800 sub-arch is incomplete, hackish (at least in IDE), maintainers
>  don't reply to emails and haven't touched it in awhile.

And the hardware is obsolete, isn't it?  Does anyone know when they were
last manufactured, and how popular they are?