From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264796AbUEPTYp (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 May 2004 15:24:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264799AbUEPTYp (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 May 2004 15:24:45 -0400 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:37851 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264796AbUEPTYn (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 May 2004 15:24:43 -0400 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC][DOC] writing IDE driver guidelines Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 21:26:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: Marc Singer , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200405151923.50343.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <200405151958.03322.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <40A69848.9020304@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <40A69848.9020304@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200405162126.05428.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 16 of May 2004 00:23, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>>- define ide_default_irq(), ide_init_default_irq() > >>> and ide_default_io_base() to (0) > >> > >>Maybe provide generic definitions, so that new arches don't even > >>have to care about this? > > > > Please explain. > > Your document appears to imply that each new arch should define the > above three symbols. > > My suggestion is to devise a method by which new arches don't have to > care about those symbols at all, unless required to do so by the > underlying hardware. OK will work on this