From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261252AbUEQNae (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 09:30:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261321AbUEQNad (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 09:30:33 -0400 Received: from [194.151.80.102] ([194.151.80.102]:28519 "EHLO mail.research.newtrade.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261252AbUEQNad (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 09:30:33 -0400 From: Duncan Sands To: gene.heskett@verizon.net, "Justin Piszcz" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.6 appears to be 3 to 4 times slower than 2.6.5. Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:07:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200405151038.07163.gene.heskett@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200405151038.07163.gene.heskett@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200405171007.18412.baldrick@free.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I noted that my epson C82 usb printer was running about 25% of its > normal speed last night, it took gimp-print several hours to do half > a dozen 8x10's in 720dpi. gkrellm's display looks normal though, > with setiathome currently taking 90+% of the cpu, which is normal. 2.6.6 or 2.6.6 plus patches from BK or -mm? Thanks, Duncan.