From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264990AbUETH2M (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 03:28:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265029AbUETH2M (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 03:28:12 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:48157 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264990AbUETH2J (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 03:28:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:39:51 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Davidlohr Bueso A Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy , '@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: bk repository Message-ID: <20040520073951.GA2210@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Davidlohr Bueso A , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy , '@ravnborg.org References: <1085025662.1032.10.camel@offworld> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1085025662.1032.10.camel@offworld> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:01:02AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso A wrote: > When will the 2.6 branch be added to the bitkeeper resository? It's alrweady there, but with a bit mis-leading name. bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 To see the repository in your browser use: http://linux.bkbits.net and select the linux-2.5 repository. The reason to keep the linux-2.5 name is simply that renaming the repository would cause parent information to be void for all people pulling from this directory. To my knowledge there is no possibility to symlink two repositories, so both names could live in parrallel for a while?? Sam