From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264648AbUEVCfj (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 22:35:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264719AbUEVCcv (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 22:32:51 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:51367 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264648AbUEUWiH (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 18:38:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 23:40:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6-mm] Make i386 boot not so chatty Message-Id: <20040520234006.291c3dfa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > This patch silences the default i386 boot by putting a lot of development > related printks under KERN_DEBUG loglevel, allowing the normal chatty mode > to be turned on by using the 'debug' kernel parameter. I think I like it chatty. Turning this stuff off by default makes kernel developers' lives that little bit harder. Is the `quiet' option not suitable?