From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265851AbUEUMGz (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 08:06:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265538AbUEUMGz (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 08:06:55 -0400 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:42621 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265851AbUEUMGg (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 08:06:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:18:51 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg , Kai Germaschewski Subject: Re: No forces rebuild while changing GCC? Message-ID: <20040521121851.GA2322@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg , Kai Germaschewski References: <20040520181617.GE1912@lug-owl.de> <20040520185635.GA4256@mars.ravnborg.org> <20040520201541.GH1912@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040520201541.GH1912@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Right... It works as expectes and tried hard to build a consistent > kernel (actually, you did a great job at that!). Most kudos goes to Kai Germaschewski. Sam