From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262873AbUEXHMi (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 03:12:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264026AbUEXHLi (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 03:11:38 -0400 Received: from web90009.mail.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.94.67]:27994 "HELO web90009.mail.scd.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263646AbUEXHL1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 03:11:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20040524071126.92368.qmail@web90009.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 00:11:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Phy Prabab Subject: Re: 4g/4g for 2.6.6 To: arjanv@redhat.com Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1085382314.2780.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is this source, or precompiled targeting just RH setups? Thank you for your help. Phy --- Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 23:55, Phy Prabab wrote: > > So do I understand this correctly, in 2.6.7(+) it > will > > no longer be necessary to have the 4g patches? I > will > > be able to get 4g/process with the going forward > > kernels? > > The kernel RPMs I do > (http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.6/) pretty much > will have it always for 2.6. Not just for large > memory configs, but > because several userspace applications (databases, > java etc) really like > that extra Gb of virtual space too. > As for the cost; 4:4 split seems to be hardly > expensive at all, only in > some microbenchmarks. > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer