mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Billy Biggs <vektor@dumbterm.net>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tvtime and the Linux 2.6 scheduler
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:43:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040524084334.GB24967@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405240254.20171.kernel@kolivas.org>


* Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:

> >      33 ms : time per NTSC frame
> 
> snip
> 
> The followup email from someone describing good performance may help
> us understand what's going on. Your example of poor performance is one
> when the cpu performance is marginal to get exactly 30 fps processed
> and on the screen. The cpu overhead in 2.6 is slightly higher than 2.4
> so a borderline case may be just pushed over. 

most of the cpu overhead comes from HZ=1000. Especial with SCHED_FIFO
there should be minimal (if any) impact from the scheduler changes -
SCHED_FIFO tasks get all CPU time, no ifs and whens.

could people who experience tvtime performance problems apply the patch
below to change HZ back to 100? Does it have any impact?

	Ingo

--- linux/include/asm-i386/param.h.orig	
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/param.h	
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 #define _ASMi386_PARAM_H
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
-# define HZ		1000		/* Internal kernel timer frequency */
+# define HZ		100		/* Internal kernel timer frequency */
 # define USER_HZ	100		/* .. some user interfaces are in "ticks" */
 # define CLOCKS_PER_SEC		(USER_HZ)	/* like times() */
 #endif

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-24  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-23 15:48 Billy Biggs
2004-05-23 16:20 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2004-05-23 16:54 ` Con Kolivas
2004-05-23 17:20   ` Billy Biggs
2004-05-23 21:03   ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-05-24  8:43   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-05-24  6:58     ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-24  9:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-24  7:14         ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-24  9:34         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-23 22:49 ` szonyi calin
2004-05-24 19:38   ` Bill Davidsen
2004-05-25  8:49     ` Tobias Diedrich
2004-05-24  9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-24 11:45   ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-05-27 11:35 ` Redeeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040524084334.GB24967@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vektor@dumbterm.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®