From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263301AbUEXQpv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 12:45:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263325AbUEXQpv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 12:45:51 -0400 Received: from web12308.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.173.106]:34177 "HELO web12308.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263301AbUEXQpu (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2004 12:45:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20040524164550.11639.qmail@web12308.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephen Cameron Subject: Re: x86_64 and ioctls from 32 bit userland To: root@chaos.analogic.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2004, Stephen Cameron wrote: [...] > > Yes. The user-mode 32-bit pointer within a structure is no different > than passing a 32-bit user-mode pointer as the third parameter to > an ioctl(fd, WHAT, ptr). > Thanks, I've got it working now. -- steve __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer