From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264812AbUEYIc3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 04:32:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264815AbUEYIc3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 04:32:29 -0400 Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]:57559 "EHLO mx01.qsc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264812AbUEYI2c convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 04:28:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:22:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040525.102241.635758403.rene@rocklinux-consulting.de> To: azarah@nosferatu.za.org Cc: kangur@polcom.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rock-user@rocklinux.org Subject: Re: Distributions vs kernel development From: Rene Rebe In-Reply-To: <1085426241.9516.7.camel@nosferatu.lan> References: <20040509.111350.67880957.rene@rocklinux-consulting.de> <1085426241.9516.7.camel@nosferatu.lan> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1 on XEmacs 21.4.13 (Rational FORTRAN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "heap.localnet", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:17:21 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 11:13, Rene Rebe wrote: > > > But the last time I took a look not even an installer or such. + > > Gentoo has no support for custom modifications not even thinking about > > a way to group such custom modifications / build configuration into a > > well defined way to form a distribution. + ROCK Linux has a real > > sandbox build environment, not this optimization via CFLAGS, and so on > > Gentoo wannabe. > > > > Weird .. last time I checked, Gentoo sandbox was originally derived from > ROCK Linux's sandbox wrapper .... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:17:21 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 11:13, Rene Rebe wrote: > > > But the last time I took a look not even an installer or such. + > > Gentoo has no support for custom modifications not even thinking about > > a way to group such custom modifications / build configuration into a > > well defined way to form a distribution. + ROCK Linux has a real > > sandbox build environment, not this optimization via CFLAGS, and so on > > Gentoo wannabe. > > > > Weird .. last time I checked, Gentoo sandbox was originally derived from > ROCK Linux's sandbox wrapper .... Interesting ,) I did not know Gentoo copied ROCK Linux code, too. I already put re-reviewing Gentoo on my this-year's TODO. So I'm finally up-to-date with such stuff again ... Sincerely yours, René Rebe - ROCK Linux stable release maintainer -- René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin rene@rocklinux.org rene@rocklinux-consulting.de http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux-consulting.de