From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264826AbUEYJaU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 05:30:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264827AbUEYJaU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 05:30:20 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:948 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264826AbUEYJaR (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 05:30:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 02:29:41 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Help understanding slow down Message-Id: <20040525022941.62ab4cc4.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040525103238.GA4212@elte.hu> References: <20040524062754.GO1833@holomorphy.com> <20040524063959.5107.qmail@web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com> <20040524005331.71465614.akpm@osdl.org> <20040525103238.GA4212@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > > with the patch below we will print a big fat warning. (I did not want to > deny idle=poll altogether - future HT implementations might work fine > with polling idle.) idle=poll is handy when profiling the kernel with oprofile clock-unhalted events. Because if you use the normal halt-based idle loop no profile "ticks" are accounted to idle time at all and the results are really hard to understand.