From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264543AbUEYLKJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 07:10:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264582AbUEYLKJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 07:10:09 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:20615 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264543AbUEYLKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 07:10:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 04:09:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Mackerras Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ stacks for PPC64 Message-Id: <20040525040934.14e20635.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <16563.9827.783950.254480@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <16563.9827.783950.254480@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Mackerras wrote: > > This patch implements separate per-cpu stacks for > processing interrupts and softirqs, along the lines of the > CONFIG_4KSTACKS stuff on x86. Your show_stack()-from-irq code will need a bit of work to hop across to the next stack.