From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264780AbUEYUER (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 16:04:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265080AbUEYUEQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 16:04:16 -0400 Received: from mail1.kontent.de ([81.88.34.36]:8862 "EHLO Mail1.KONTENT.De") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264780AbUEYUEP (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 16:04:15 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: root@chaos.analogic.com Subject: Re: very low performance on SCSI disks if device node is in tmpfs Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:02:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Olaf Hering , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040525184732.GB26661@suse.de> <20040525193458.GA21120@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405252202.54745.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 25. Mai 2004 21:44 schrieb Richard B. Johnson: > On Tue, 25 May 2004, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, Richard B. Johnson wrote unrelated stuff: > > > > It is not unrelated stuff. If you think it is, you will > come to an incorrect conclusion with your experiments. > As I stated, you are not actually communicating with a > device-file except for the initial open(). Exactly therefore the results are so extremely odd. Either looking up a device node is very expensive, or we have an unknown phenomenon. Regards Oliver