From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263685AbUE0M4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 08:56:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264102AbUE0M4N (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 08:56:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:64657 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263685AbUE0M4M (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 08:56:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:45:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4k stacks in 2.6 Message-ID: <20040527124551.GA12194@elte.hu> References: <20040525211522.GF29378@dualathlon.random> <20040526103303.GA7008@elte.hu> <20040526125014.GE12142@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20040526125300.GA18028@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040526130047.GF12142@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20040526130500.GB18028@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040526164129.GA31758@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040526164129.GA31758@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.26.8-itk2 (ELTE 1.1) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.65 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jörn Engel wrote: > Anyway, whether we go for 4k in 2.6 or not, [...] 4K stacks have been added to the 2.6 kernel more than a month ago, are in the official 2.6.6 kernel and are used by FC2 happily, so objections are a bit belated. I only reacted to Andrea's mail to clear up apparent misunderstandings about the impact and implementation of this feature. Ingo