From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264755AbUE0PXM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 11:23:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264799AbUE0PXM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 11:23:12 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:3992 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264755AbUE0PXJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 11:23:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:21:56 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Keith Owens Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4k stacks in 2.6 Message-ID: <20040527152156.GI23194@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20040527145935.GE23194@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4382.1085670482@ocs3.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4382.1085670482@ocs3.ocs.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 May 2004 01:08:02 +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2004 16:59:35 +0200, > =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel wrote: > > > >Plus the script is wrong sometimes. I have had trouble with sizes > >around 4G or 2G, and never found the time to really figure out what's > >going on. Might be an alloca thing that got misparsed somehow. > > Some code results in negative adjustments to the stack size on exit, > which look like 4G sizes. My script checks for those and ignores them. > /^[89a-f].......$/d; Ok, looks as if only my script is wrong. Do you know what exactly causes such a negative adjustment? Jörn -- Optimizations always bust things, because all optimizations are, in the long haul, a form of cheating, and cheaters eventually get caught. -- Larry Wall