From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263184AbUE1OSn (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2004 10:18:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263199AbUE1OSn (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2004 10:18:43 -0400 Received: from mail.rdsor.ro ([193.231.238.10]:7301 "HELO mail.rdsor.ro") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263184AbUE1OSi (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2004 10:18:38 -0400 From: Balint Cristian Organization: Home To: Thomas Steudten Subject: Re: Kernel crash/ oops >= 2.6.5 with gcc 3.4.0 on alpha Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 17:19:20 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Herbert Poetzl , linux-admin@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org References: <40B726C0.5030400@steudten.com> <20040528123758.GE19544@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <40B74779.40406@steudten.com> In-Reply-To: <40B74779.40406@steudten.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405281719.20593.rezso@rdsor.ro> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 28 May 2004 10:06, Thomas Steudten wrote: > I upgrade the binutils from 2.15.90 to 2.15.91, but the same > message appears: > > gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/cifs/.cifsfs.o.d -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mno-fp-regs > -ffixed-8 -msmall-data -mcpu=pca56 -Wa,-mev6 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -DMODULE -DKBUILD_BASENAME=cifsfs -DKBUILD_MODNAME=cifs -c -o > fs/cifs/.tmp_cifsfs.o fs/cifs/cifsfs.c > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:7: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .got > Hi ! I got same error with 2.6.7-rc1 ! I tryed 2 days ago with FC2 3.3.3-7 gcc and very latest CVS binutils. I tryed with older 3 variants of binutils, i suspect gcc rather than binutils or else. The ony what i dont tryed is older gcc. > > > > hmm, did you update the binutils too? > > (if not, I'd try that) > > >