From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264223AbUE2JRX (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 05:17:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264231AbUE2JRX (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 05:17:23 -0400 Received: from electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com ([213.41.134.224]:4566 "EHLO fr.zoreil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264223AbUE2JRW (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 05:17:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 11:16:16 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Recommended compiler version Message-ID: <20040529111616.A16627@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The linux kernel README and Documentation/CHANGES suggests to use gcc 2.95.3. These files have not been updated for ages. Is there a rough consensus regarding the required versions of the different tools in the buildchain or should one simply submit a patch to remove the offending files ? -- Ueimor