From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Danny ter Haar <dth@dth.net>
Cc: bunk@fs.tum.de, wa1ter@myrealbox.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dth@ncc1701.cistron.net,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 09:41:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040530094120.61b22d2e.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040530143734.GA24627@dth.net>
On Sun, 30 May 2004 16:37:34 +0200 Danny ter Haar <dth@dth.net> wrote:
| Quoting Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de):
| > @Jeff:
| > At a first glance, it seems the patch below that simply removes the
| > dependency of NET_GIGE on NET_ETHERNET would suffice.
| >
| > Is this correct or did I miss something?
| >
| > cu
| > Adrian
| >
| > --- linux-2.6.7-rc2-full/drivers/net/Kconfig.old 2004-05-30 15:33:24.000000000 +0200
| > +++ linux-2.6.7-rc2-full/drivers/net/Kconfig 2004-05-30 15:38:41.000000000 +0200
| > @@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@
| >
| > config NET_GIGE
| > bool "Gigabit Ethernet (1000/10000 Mbit) controller support"
| > - depends on NETDEVICES && NET_ETHERNET && (PCI || SBUS)
| > + depends on NETDEVICES && (PCI || SBUS)
| > help
| > Gigabit ethernet. It's yummy and fast, fast, fast.
|
| Fresh source, this patch, old config from 2.6.7-rc1-bk2 and make
| oldconfig now works ;)
I looked at this last night, after the first reported problem
I'm not surprised that this works, but I'm concerned about the use
of CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET in net/ipv4/arp.c. I'd _guess_ that
CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET needs to be seen as enabled over there,
even though it's not enabled in drivers/net/*.
I don't know if it's a satisfactory solution, but
net/ipv4/arp.c could also check for CONFIG_NET_GIGE.
However, that doesn't seem like the right thing to do IMO.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-30 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-29 14:51 walt
2004-05-30 13:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 13:45 ` [patch] " Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 14:37 ` Danny ter Haar
2004-05-30 16:41 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2004-05-30 17:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-30 19:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-30 20:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-31 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-31 10:00 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040530094120.61b22d2e.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=dth@dth.net \
--cc=dth@ncc1701.cistron.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wa1ter@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®