From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264725AbUEaSjk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 14:39:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264731AbUEaSjk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 14:39:40 -0400 Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:14614 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264725AbUEaSjj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 14:39:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 20:42:18 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Bjorn Wesen Cc: Dan Kegel , Mikael Starvik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Delete cris architecture? Message-ID: <20040531184218.GA2101@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bjorn Wesen , Dan Kegel , Mikael Starvik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <40BB3751.6060200@kegel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 06:14:02PM +0200, Bjorn Wesen wrote: > The CRIS architecture is stable and supported by Axis Communications > officially in 2.4, but the 2.6 port is work-in-progress, thus you could > expect problems building it from the vanilla kernel source. It works > in-house on 2.6, but perhaps all patches have not trickled out to the > official kernel yet (although they should have I think, so it's good that > you mention stuff like this). When grepping the source and even doing cross architecture changes it is nice to have a ratehr up-to-date version in the main stream kernel. It would be nice if Axis could at least drop an update of the tree for each kernel release (provided there are any changes). This would allow all of us to get a better overview, and in some cases we may even introduce new stuff / fix errors. So please start to feed Andrew (or Linus) regularly with updates. Sam