From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S265022AbUFAQhK@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265022AbUFAQhK (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:37:10 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265024AbUFAQhJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:37:09 -0400
Received: from atlrel7.hp.com ([156.153.255.213]:16324 "EHLO atlrel7.hp.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265022AbUFAQdP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:33:15 -0400
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: update Documentation/SubmittingPatches?
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:33:10 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200406011033.10129.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Lots of patches now include the "Signed-off-by" tag.  I'd like to
hop on the bandwagon, but I haven't followed all the discussion
so I don't know exactly what I would be signing off on.

If the semantics of "Signed-off-by" has been decided upon,
perhaps a Documentation/SubmittingPatches update is in order?