From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265398AbUFCAP7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:15:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265396AbUFCAP7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:15:59 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:30166 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265398AbUFCAP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:15:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:17:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Jackson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sys cpumap for > 352 NR_CPUS Message-Id: <20040602171724.2221f97e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040602165902.73dfc977.pj@sgi.com> References: <20040602161115.1340f698.pj@sgi.com> <20040602162330.0664ec5d.akpm@osdl.org> <20040602165902.73dfc977.pj@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Jackson wrote: > > > Can't we just stick a PAGE_SIZE in here? > > We could - either way works about as well. Is there something special > about PAGE_SIZE here? Is that in fact what sysfs is making available? Think so. Greg, can you confirm that a SYSDEV_ATTR's handler can safely assume that it has a PAGE_SIZE buffer to write to?