From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265233AbUFDBSg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 21:18:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265311AbUFDBSg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 21:18:36 -0400 Received: from mfep1.odn.ne.jp ([143.90.131.179]:57236 "EHLO t-mta1.odn.ne.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265233AbUFDBSf (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 21:18:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 22:20:04 +0900 From: Aric Cyr To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nForce2 C1halt fixup, again Message-ID: <20040604222004.A491%acyr@alumni.uwaterloo.ca> References: <20040604112618.A1789%acyr@alumni.uwaterloo.ca> <200406031712.51458.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406031712.51458.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i-ja0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 05:12:51PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > If bit 0x10000000 is not set then C1 Halt Disconnect is disabled. > I have reports that it is unsupported on some boards. > > So what about patch below instead? Thanks Bartlomiej. I reversed my patch and have applied yours and am testing it now. If my system doesn't freeze at all today, I think that this should be a sufficient (and necessary!) patch. One thing that bothers me though is that 2.6.5 was unstable in the same way as far as I can recall. Since this fixup was not included, do you think it could have been related to something else that was fixed in 2.6.6? Maybe IO-APIC or the "acpi_skip_timer_override" bootparam maybe? Thanks again! -- Aric Cyr