From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Sebastian Kloska <kloska@scienion.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: APM realy sucks on 2.6.x
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:38:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040607123839.GC11860@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C0E91D.9070900@scienion.de>
Hi!
> My impression is that APM is slowly degenerating while ACPI is not
> (yet ?) able to fill the gap. The suspend feature of ACPI is stated to
> be dangerous and experimental and does not work for me at all.
That sounds about right.
> After all this bashing...
>
> Is there anyone out there who has the same experiences ?
>
> Is there a workaround ?
>
> Is it possible to somehow downgrade APM in the 2.6 kernel
> to the 2.4.x state ?
>
> How could one debug this kind of missbehaviour ? Where do
> I have to look for potential miss configurations of the system ?
>
> I'm really willing to help the APM developers to track down this bug
> but don't have a clue how to debug this kind stuff.
What APM developers? There are none as far as I know.
Try removing calls to device_* in apm.c. Better yet become APM
developer.
Pavel
--
934a471f20d6580d5aad759bf0d97ddc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-07 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-04 21:26 Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-04 23:14 ` Keith Duthie
2004-06-05 8:03 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-04 23:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-06-05 17:18 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-06 3:29 ` Michael Clark
2004-06-06 4:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-06 13:56 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 12:38 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-06-07 13:37 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 14:05 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 14:28 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 14:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 19:53 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-07 21:13 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-08 4:16 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 7:12 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-08 8:58 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-08 9:02 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 9:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-08 9:50 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-08 23:59 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-08 17:48 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-06-08 18:59 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2004-06-08 20:18 ` Ian Stirling
2004-06-07 14:42 ` Keith Duthie
2004-06-07 14:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 14:47 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 14:51 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 15:09 ` Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-07 16:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-06-07 15:19 ` Keith Duthie
2004-06-07 8:11 Sebastian Kloska
2004-06-08 9:49 Sau Dan Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040607123839.GC11860@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=kloska@scienion.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®