From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264897AbUFHIp1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264900AbUFHIp1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:45:27 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:10170 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264897AbUFHIp0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 04:45:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:45:06 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Timothy Miller , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4k stacks in 2.6 Message-ID: <20040608084506.GA21109@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20040525211522.GF29378@dualathlon.random> <20040526103303.GA7008@elte.hu> <20040526125014.GE12142@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20040526125300.GA18028@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040526130047.GF12142@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <40C4B09B.406@techsource.com> <1086675984.2736.20.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1086675984.2736.20.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 June 2004 08:26:25 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > That gave me an idea. Sometimes in chip design, we 'overconstrain' the > > logic synthesizer, because static timing analyzers often produce > > inaccurate results. Anyhow, what if we were to go to 4K stacks but in > > static code analysis, flag anything which uses more than 2K or even 1K? With 2.6.6, there are currently just a few non-recursive paths over 3k. 2k will give you a *lot* of output, but if you insist... ;) http://wh.fh-wedel.de/~joern/data.nointermezzo.cs2.2k.bz2 470k compressed, 65M uncompressed Feel free to send patches. > the patch I sent to akpm went to 400 bytes actually, but yeah, even that > already is debatable. 400 bytes? That is for a single function, I assume. Jörn -- Those who come seeking peace without a treaty are plotting. -- Sun Tzu