From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265894AbUFIS1D (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:27:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266223AbUFIS1D (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:27:03 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:3767 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265894AbUFIS1A (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:27:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:27:06 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Byron Stanoszek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [STACK] >3k call path in ncpfs Message-ID: <20040609182706.GC2950@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20040609122002.GD21168@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 June 2004 14:15:19 -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > Jörn, do you have any analysis of stack usage for x86-64 or other 64-bit > processors? I assume they would more readily reach the 4K stack boundaries > as all longs and pointers are 8 bytes instead of 4. No I don't, the tool isn't even tested on anything but i386. Do any 64bit architectures use 4k stacks? Jörn -- If you're willing to restrict the flexibility of your approach, you can almost always do something better. -- John Carmack