From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263154AbUFJWZc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:25:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263159AbUFJWZc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:25:32 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:43191 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263154AbUFJWZb (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:25:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:28:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Bikram Assal" Cc: bwindle@fint.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ENOMEM in do_get_write_access, retrying Message-Id: <20040610152807.4f06c3b1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Bikram Assal" wrote: > > The kernel version installed on the server is 2.4.18-5 > > Would that be a problem ? Do I need to upgrade my kernel ? > > Since the memory doesn't seem to be a problem apparently, what should be my next step to check the flaw. > > Although this happened only once, this could lead to a possible problem. It's just a warning. The filesystem retries the allocation and it succeeded. There's nothing you need to do.