From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264375AbUFKWc3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:32:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264377AbUFKWc3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:32:29 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:37558 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264375AbUFKWc2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:32:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:35:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: mike.miller@hp.com Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cciss update for 2.6.7 Message-Id: <20040611153512.4c8e9746.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040611222613.GA11102@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net> References: <20040611222613.GA11102@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mike.miller@hp.com wrote: > > I sent this in earlier this weel but I didn't see any indication > it was received. It was included in 2.6.7-rc3-mm1. I tend not to ack stuff, sorry. If you don't hear, assume it went in. As we're at -rc3 I'd only be merging up very safe or very critical things, or patches to unimportant or very experimental code. I don't think this patch is any of those, is it?