From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266365AbUFQEll (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:41:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266371AbUFQEll (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:41:41 -0400 Received: from havoc.gtf.org ([216.162.42.101]:23017 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266365AbUFQEli (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:41:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:41:36 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , achew@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] current libata queue Message-ID: <20040617044136.GA21553@havoc.gtf.org> References: <20040617043321.GA20746@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040617043321.GA20746@havoc.gtf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:33:21AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Here is my latest queue, including the nvidia changes and config > changes. > > Instead of two config options -- one in IDE and one in libata -- > I decided just to do one in IDE: > "Support for SATA (deprecated; use libata)?" > > Let me know if anyone feels I should still do a config option in libata. > > Also, if this patch is too large for review, I would be glad to split > them up and post them separately. BTW, I'm in the middle of debugging the AHCI merge, so the patch just posted won't go upstream until further changes land. Jeff