From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264924AbUFRCKp (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:10:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264948AbUFRCKp (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:10:45 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:41901 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264924AbUFRCKo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:10:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 03:10:43 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Chris Mason Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] __bd_forget should wait for inodes using the mapping Message-ID: <20040618021043.GV12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <1087523668.8002.103.camel@watt.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1087523668.8002.103.camel@watt.suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:54:28PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > __bd_forget will change the mapping for filesystem inodes without > waiting to make sure no users of the block device address space are > using that mapping. Filesystem block device inodes have no business even looking at their ->i_mapping. Where do you need to do that?