From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265149AbUFRNDX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:03:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265152AbUFRNDW (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:03:22 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:9171 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265149AbUFRNDS (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:03:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:02:42 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Finn Thain , Andreas Schwab , Linux/m68k , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: make checkstack on m68k Message-ID: <20040618130242.GD18258@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20040617182658.GB29029@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 June 2004 21:36:11 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > *bummer* > > why doesn't checkstack.pl complain if I forget to specify `m68k'?!? It tries to guess the architecture on it's own. Guessing is not working for m68k, aparently. What does "uname -m" tell you? [ Yes, this breaks for cross compilation. If anyone really cares, please send patches. ] Jörn -- The strong give up and move away, while the weak give up and stay. -- unknown