From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S265140AbUFRNn5@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265140AbUFRNn5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:43:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265141AbUFRNn5
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:43:57 -0400
Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:4823 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265140AbUFRNnz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:43:55 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:43:13 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Finn Thain <ft01@webmastery.com.au>,
       Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
       Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
       Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: make checkstack on m68k
Message-ID: <20040618134313.GG18258@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
References: <200406161930.VAA16618@pfultra.phil.uni-sb.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406171812440.8197@bonkers.disegno.com.au> <20040617183616.GC29029@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0406172127150.1495@waterleaf.sonytel.be> <20040618121813.GB18258@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0406181537210.11779@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0406181537210.11779@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 18 June 2004 15:39:38 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 June 2004 21:27:35 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's not as ugly as my hack.  Can I get a success report from m68k?
> > > > Thanks!
> >
> > Good.  Finn, can you resend to me with a signed-off-by: comment?  If
> > you grow bored, you could seperate the i386 regexes (sub..., add...)
> > as well.
> 
> If you insist...
> 
> Add m68k support to checkstack.pl
> 
> Regular expression combination by Andres Schwab

Ah, no.  I really wanted Finn's version with two seperate regexes,
it's much cleaner.  An array of regexes might be the best, but in a
perfect world, we would have compiler support instead, so I don't mind
a little ugliness.

Jörn

-- 
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that
something else is more important than fear.
-- Ambrose Redmoon