From: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Assuming someone else called the IRQ
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:39:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406261839.39274.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040626181552.C30532@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Saturday 26 June 2004 18:15, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > Every kernel in the 2.6 serious so far has exhibited the same problem;
> > after some time of running my desktop system, I get:
> >
> > Assuming someone else called the IRQ
> >...
> > 19: 8748235 IO-APIC-level ohci1394, yenta, eth0
>
> You don't say what eth0 is. At a guess, it's a prism54 card, because the
> only place I find that message in the kernel is in the prism54 driver:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/prism54/islpci_dev.c:
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "Assuming someone else called the IRQ\n");
>
Yes.
> I'd imagine that the OHCI1394 generates a fair number of interrupts,
> so... this highlights the problem of leaving debugging printk's,
> even at KERN_DEBUG level in a driver interrupt path.
I would agree.
>
> At a guess, Luis R. Rodriguez may be the maintainer for prism54,
> so...
Luis, could you please look into removing this message from the sources. It
causes my kernel ring buffer to be wiped fairly quickly, which is annoying
for debugging development kernels.
[OT] Thanks for the reply Russell. Any chance you could look over the BIOS
workaround on bugzilla while we're discussing PCMCIA? I put a patch on there
that's probably a load of nonsense, and we still haven't got your opinion on
the matter..
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1840
It affects very few people, but it's a safe enough workaround as I'm using it
successfully as I write this.
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
personal: alistair()devzero!co!uk
university: s0348365()sms!ed!ac!uk
student: CS/AI Undergraduate
contact: 1F2 55 South Clerk Street,
Edinburgh. EH8 9PP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-26 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-26 17:08 Alistair John Strachan
2004-06-26 17:15 ` Russell King
2004-06-26 17:39 ` Alistair John Strachan [this message]
2004-06-27 16:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-06-26 17:20 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-06-26 17:42 ` Alistair John Strachan
2004-06-27 8:02 Margit Schubert-While
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200406261839.39274.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--to=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®