From: Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:52:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406301752.i5UHqa1q011464@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:57:56 EDT." <20040630165756.GX21264@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
>On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:32:03PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>> >One thing to note is that NPTL defaults to PTHREAD_INHERIT_SCHED
>> >while LinuxThreads defaults to PTHREAD_EXPLICIT_SCHED.
>> >So, if you care about what scheduling created threads will have
>> >and want it to work with both NPTL and LinuxThreads, you want
>> >pthread_attr_setinheritsched (&attr, PTHREAD_*_SCHED);
>> >explicitely.
>>
>> But since we always set the scheduling class explicitly, should the
>> inherited scheduler class make any difference?
>
>Of course.
i understand that in the context of "pthread_attr_*; pthread_create();",
but we use pthread_create() and then set scheduling class/priority
within the new thread. Why would INHERIT_SCHED affect that? Does it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-30 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-30 13:41 Paul Davis
2004-06-30 15:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-30 15:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-30 15:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-06-30 16:32 ` Paul Davis
2004-06-30 16:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-06-30 17:52 ` Paul Davis [this message]
2004-06-30 15:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-30 16:12 ` Paul Davis
2004-06-30 17:07 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-06-30 17:50 ` Paul Davis
2004-07-01 18:03 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-01 18:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-01 22:45 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-02 0:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-02 1:38 ` Peter Williams
2004-07-02 2:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-02 3:03 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-02 3:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-02 3:27 ` Paul Davis
2004-07-02 7:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-02 10:40 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-07-06 0:48 ` Peter Williams
2004-07-02 14:42 ` Paul Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200406301752.i5UHqa1q011464@localhost.localdomain \
--to=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®