From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266358AbUGAWoZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:44:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266362AbUGAWoZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:44:25 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:13037 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266358AbUGAWnN (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:43:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:45:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: mpm@selenic.com, paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK Message-Id: <20040701154554.30063e97.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040701181401.GB21066@holomorphy.com> References: <200406301341.i5UDfkKX010518@localhost.localdomain> <20040701180356.GI5414@waste.org> <20040701181401.GB21066@holomorphy.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:03:56PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > I'm afraid these "brave souls" have shown up to the baby shower after > > the child's been accepted to college. Developers getting around to > > testing 2.6 after multiple vendors are shipping it should not be > > characterized as courageous. > > I appear to have nuked the thread you're replying to in disgust over > this precise issue. In fairness, the CPU scheduler has been spinning like a top for a couple of years, and it still ain't settled. That's just the one in Linus's tree, let alone the umpteen rewrites which are floating about.