From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S266289AbUGBGQT@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S266289AbUGBGQT (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:16:19 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266314AbUGBGQT
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:16:19 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:6048 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266289AbUGBGQS convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Jul 2004 02:16:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:15:05 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: ouellettes@videotron.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4.27-rc2] [TRIVIAL] C99 initializers
Message-Id: <20040701231505.7275a90f.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040702.132527.21994176.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <40E4E1C9.9080007@videotron.ca>
	<20040702.132527.21994176.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:25:27 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> wrote:

> In article <40E4E1C9.9080007@videotron.ca> (at Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:17:13 -0400), Stephane Ouellette <ouellettes@videotron.ca> says:
> 
> >     the attached patches add C99 initializers to the following files in 
> > the net/ipv4 directory:
> > 
> >     arp.c
> >     udp.c
> >     protocol.c
> >     tcp_ipv4.c
> 
> I think there is consensus not to migrate 2.4.x to C99 initializers.
> Am I wrong?

That's true.