From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264251AbUGBPvL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:51:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264639AbUGBPvL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:51:11 -0400 Received: from atlrel6.hp.com ([156.153.255.205]:34178 "EHLO atlrel6.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264251AbUGBPvJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:51:09 -0400 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Rajesh Shah Subject: Re: MSI to memory? Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:51:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Tom L Nguyen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200407011215.59723.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <20040701115339.A4265@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20040701115339.A4265@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407020951.08038.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 01 July 2004 12:53 pm, Rajesh Shah wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:15:59PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > If so, is that a useful capability that should be exposed through > > the Linux MSI interface? > ... > What type of usage model did you have in mind to have the > device write to memory instead of using MSI for interrupts? I'm not a driver writer. I don't have any usage model in mind. I'm merely asking whether this is interesting functionality, because I don't see any generic way to use it, given the current Linux MSI interfaces. I guess the answer is "the time to figure out an interface is when somebody figures out an interesting way to use it."