mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linas@austin.ibm.com
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Cc: nfont@austin.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.6] PPC64: log firmware errors during boot.
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:13:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040702131347.V21634@forte.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088789345.26946.9.camel@localhost>; from hollisb@us.ibm.com on Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:29:08PM -0500

On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:29:08PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 11:18, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> > > I asked about this before, and was told that there is no way to
> > > determine the severity of an event without doing full parsing of the
> > > binary data. I'd be thrilled to be wrong...
> > 
> > Gettting the severity of an RTAS event is possible, and not too 
> > difficult.  Check out asm-ppc64/rtas.h for a definition of the
> > RTAS event header (struct rtas_error_log).  All RTAS events have the 
> > same initial header containing the severity of the event.
> 
> Great! Of course that won't help much if we get repeating "important"
> events that aren't even interesting much less important, but it's worth
> trying to printk only the important ones and leave the rest to netlink.

OK,

I'd like to wait until some of the current patches get in, so as to 
avoid a case of patch-versionitis.

I mis-spoke earlier about who the intendend consumers of the printk'ed 
messages are; rtasd already implements its own kernl-to-user interface
via the /proc interface.  Yes, everything in /proc/ppc64 is prolly 
deprecated, but lets put this off till later.

--linas

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-02 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-30  0:10 linas
2004-06-30 10:55 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-07-01 21:06   ` linas
2004-07-02  5:36     ` Greg KH
2004-07-02 10:44     ` Paul Mackerras
2004-07-02 14:15       ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-07-02 16:18         ` Nathan Fontenot
2004-07-02 17:29           ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-07-02 18:13             ` linas [this message]
2004-07-02 18:27               ` Greg KH
2004-07-02 18:55                 ` Dave Hansen
2004-07-02 19:44                   ` Greg KH
2004-07-06 13:24             ` Jake Moilanen
2004-07-06 13:41   ` Jake Moilanen
2004-07-08 16:03     ` linas
2004-07-08 17:55       ` Jake Moilanen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040702131347.V21634@forte.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®