From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265654AbUGDMei (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 08:34:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265655AbUGDMei (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 08:34:38 -0400 Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.77]:20900 "EHLO pimout1-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265654AbUGDMeh (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 08:34:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 05:34:31 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Ikke Cc: Justin Piszcz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ap@solarrain.com Subject: Re: 4K vs 8K stacks- Which to use? Message-ID: <20040704123431.GA23204@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <297f4e0104070403553efe6821@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <297f4e0104070403553efe6821@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 12:55:07PM +0200, Ikke wrote: > I got a P2 here, and got some problems that *could* be > related to 4k stacks. I'm running 2.6.7-redeeman3 now > (i.e. 2.6.7-mm3+reiser4+nick's sheduler). If I configure > it using 4k stacks and APM as module (not loaded) I get > crashes (Page Faults I think). Same configuration, but 4k > stacks disabled and APM module disabled, runs stable. Try turning on the stack overflow checking and see what that spits out. --cw